Guided Reading Activity Making Social and Domestic Policy Answers

Government activity

Public policy is an institutionalized proposal to solve relevant and existent-world problems, guided by a conception ^[1] and implemented by programs as a grade of action created and/or enacted, typically by a regime,^[2] in response to social bug. Beyond this broad definition, public policy has been conceptualized in a variety of means.

A popular way of agreement and engaging in public policy is through a serial of stages known as "the policy wheel". The characterization of particular stages tin vary, but a basic sequence is: agenda setting – formulation – legitimation – implementation – evaluation.

Officials considered as policymakers carry responsibleness to reflect the interests of a host of dissimilar stakeholders. Policy design entails conscious and deliberate effort to ascertain policy aims and map them instrumentally. Academics and other experts in policy studies have adult a range of tools and approaches to assistance in this job.

Varying conceptions of public policy [edit]

Public policy can be conceptualized in varying ways, according to the purposes of the speaker or writer, and the characteristics of the situation they are concerned with.

One dividing line in conceptions of public policy is between those that see it primarily in terms of ideas (principles and plans of activeness) and those that see it as a drove of empirical phenomena (the things that are done, and their outcomes). The kickoff of these conceptualizations is suitable when the thing of concern is relatively uncomplicated and unambiguous, and the means of enactment are expected to be highly disciplined. But where the matter is complex and/or contested – where intentions are confused and/or disguised – it may not be possible to define the policy ideas clearly and unambiguously. In this example it may exist useful to place a policy in terms of what actually happens.^[3]

David Easton in the Us of the 1950s provided an illustration of the need he found to augment his conceptualization of public policy beyond stated ideas: "If the formal policy of an educational system forbids discrimination against Negroes but local schoolhouse boards or administrators so zone school attendance that Negroes are segregated in a few schools, both the impartial law and discriminatory practices must be considered part of the policy." Easton characterized public policy as "a spider web of decisions and deportment that allocates values".^[iv]

Other definitions of public policy in terms of a broad range of empirical phenomena include that of Paul Cairney: "the sum total of government activeness from signals of intent to the last outcomes".^[5]

An example of conceiving public policy as ideas is a definition by Richard Titmuss: "the principles that govern action directed towards given ends".^[6] Titmuss' perspective was particularly 1 of social contract ideals.

More recently, Antonio Lassance has defined public policy equally "an institutionalized proposal to solve a primal problem, guided past a conception" (Lassance, 2020: 7).^[i] Lassance's perspective and concerns are grounded in a theory of alter or program theory^[7] ^[8] which he believes can be empirically tested.

1 of the well-nigh known and controversial concepts of public policy is that of Thomas R. Dye, according to whom "public policy is whatever governments choose to do or not to do" (Dye, 1972: 2).^[9] Although widely used, Dye's concept is also criticized equally being an empty concept.^[1] Dye himself admitted that his concept "discourages elaborate academic discussions of the definition of public policy - we say only that public policy is whatever governments choose to exercise or non to practise".^[10]

In an institutionalist view, the foundation of public policy is composed of national constitutional laws and regulations. Further foundational aspects include both judicial interpretations and regulations which are mostly authorized by legislation. Public policy is considered potent when information technology solves problems efficiently and finer, serves and supports governmental institutions and policies, and encourages active citizenship.^[11]

In his volume Advanced Introduction to Public Policy, B. Guy Peters defines public policy as "the set of activities that governments appoint in for the purpose of changing their economic system and society", effectively saying that public policy is legislation brought in with the aim of benefiting or impacting the electorate in some manner.^[12] In another definition, author B. Dente in his book Understanding Policy Decisions explains public policy as "a set up of deportment that affect the solution of a policy problem, i.eastward. a dissatisfaction regarding a certain need, demand or opportunity for public intervention. Its quality is measured by the capacity to create public value."^[thirteen]

Other scholars ascertain public policy equally a system of "courses of activeness, regulatory measures, laws, and funding priorities concerning a given topic promulgated by a governmental entity or its representatives".^[14] Public policy is commonly embodied in "constitutions, legislative acts, and judicial decisions".^[xv] Transformative constitutions of Global South considers judicial actions for Public policy as paramount, since the political forces that facilitate legislative decisions may run counter to the will of the people.^[16]

Public policy focuses on the decisions that create the outputs of a political system, such as transport policies, the direction of a public health service, the assistants of a organization schooling and the organization of a defense.^[17]

In the United States, this concept refers non only to the result of policies, merely more broadly to the decision-making and assay of governmental decisions. As an bookish subject area, public policy is studied by professors and students at public policy schools of major universities throughout the country. The U.S. professional person association of public policy practitioners, researchers, scholars, and students is the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.

Much of public policy is concerned with evaluating decision-making in governments and public bureaucracies.^[17]

Public policy making and the implementation of public policy [edit]

Public policy making tin can be characterized as a dynamic, circuitous, and interactive arrangement through which public problems are identified and resolved through the cosmos of new policy or reform of existing policy.^[18]

Public problems tin can originate in endless means and require different policy responses (such as regulations, subsidies, import quotas, and laws) on the local, national, or international level. The public problems that influence public policy making tin be of economical, social, or political nature.^[19]

The Authorities holds a legal monopoly to initiate or threaten physical force to achieve its ends when necessary. For example, in times of chaos when quick conclusion making is needed.^[twenty]

Public policy making [edit]

Public policy making is a fourth dimension-consuming 'policy cycle'.

The policy cycle as prepare out in Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues.^[21]

Agenda setting [edit]

Agenda setting identifies issues that crave government attending, deciding which issue deserve the almost attention and defining the nature of the trouble.

[edit]

Nigh public problems are made through the reflection of social and ideological values. As societies and communities evolve over time, the nature in which norms, community and morals are proven adequate, unacceptable, desirable or undesirable changes also.^[22] Thus, the search of crucial problems to solve becomes difficult to distinguish inside 'top-downward' governmental bodies.

Policy stream [edit]

The policy stream is a concept developed by John Kingdon as a model proposed to evidence compelling problems need to be conjoined with two other factors (1. appropriate political climate and 2. favourable and feasible solution attached to trouble) that period together to move onto policy agenda. This reinforces the policy window, another concept demonstrating the critical moment within a fourth dimension and state of affairs that a new policy could be motivated.^[23]

Problem stream [edit]

Because the definition of public bug are not obvious, they are most often denied and non acted upon. The Problem Stream represents a policy procedure to compromise for how worthy problems are to create policies and solutions.^[22] This is represented in 5 discrete factors:

Indicators: Scientific measurements, qualitative, statistical data using empirical evidence is used to bring relevance to particular phenomena.
Estimation: Policymakers brand judgements whether an effect constitutes a problem worthy of action.
Ideology: Elements of dominant values, customs, beliefs are crucial to devising issues needed for attention.
Instances: Media coverage supports past drawing attention to issues, thus prompting policymakers to answer and address changes.

Therefore, John Kingdon'south model^[24] suggests the policy window appears through the emergence and connexion of problems, politics and policies, emphasizing the rare opportunity to stimulate and initiate new policies.^[22]

Issue attention cycle [edit]

The 'issue attending cycle' is a concept developed past Anthony Downs (1972) where problems progress through v distinct stages.^[25] This reinforces how the policy calendar does not necessarily lead to policy alter, equally public involvement dissipates, nearly problems terminate up resolving themselves or go ignored past policymakers.^[22] Its central stages include:

Pre-problem stage: The problem is non recognized past the public, media or policy makers.
Alarmed discovery and euphoric enthusiasm: something is identified as a problem, supported awareness past media to pursue seriousness of problem
Realization of costs which will be incurred by the solutions: Investigating through cost-benefit analysis, bringing awareness of financial, environmental, structural curbs to consider solutions and what makes for their consequences.
Decline in public involvement in issue: Citizens larn acceptance of the problem and information technology becomes 'normalized'. Newer issues concenter the attending of the public. Express attention span encourages policymakers to filibuster developing policy to meet which public troubles demand necessary and worthwhile solving.
Issue slips off, or back downwards, the policy calendar: The issue effectively disappears, although it has the possibility to re-sally in other pressing circumstances.

Policy formulation [edit]

This is the setting of the objectives for the policy, forth with identifying the cost and result of solutions that could be proposed from policy instruments.

Legitimation [edit]

Legitimation is when approval/ support for the policy instruments is gathered, involving ane of or a combination of executive approving, legislative approval, and seeking consent through consultation or referenda.

Implementation [edit]

Policy implementation is establishing or employing an organization to accept responsibility for the policy, making sure the organisation has the resource/legal dominance to practise so, in addition to making sure the policy is carried out as planned. An example of this would be the department of pedagogy being set upward.

Implementation gap [edit]

As stated by Paul Cairney, the implementation gap are the stages a policy must go through before an authoritative determination is made and carried out. As an case, the agenda setting stage is followed by the policy conception, this will continue until the policy is implemented. ^[26]

Top-down and bottom-up implementation [edit]

"Summit-down" and "lesser-up" describe the procedure of policy implementation. Top-down implementation means the carrying out of a policy at the top i.e. central government or legislature. The lesser-upwards approach suggests that the implementation should start with the target grouping, as they are seen as the actual implementers of policy.^[27]

Evaluation [edit]

Evaluation is the procedure of assessing the extent to which the policy has been successful, or if this was the correct policy to begin with/ was information technology implemented correctly and if and then, did it go equally expected.

Policy maintenance [edit]

Maintenance is when the policy makers decide to either terminate or continue the policy. The policy is unremarkably either continued equally is, modified, or discontinued.

Limerick [edit]

This cycle volition unless discontinued get back to the calendar-setting phase and the wheel will commence again. Nevertheless, the policy cycle is illustrated in a chronological and cyclical structure which could be misleading as in actuality, policymaking would include overlapping stages between the multiple interactions of policy proposals, adjustments, determination-making amidst multiple government institutions and respective authoritative actors.^[28] Also, although its heuristic model is straightforward and like shooting fish in a barrel to understand, it is crucial to note that the cycle is not totally applicable in all situations of policymaking.^[29]

Responsibility of policymakers [edit]

Each system is influenced by different public problems and issues, and has different stakeholders; as such, each requires different public policy.^[thirty]

In public policy making, numerous individuals, corporations, not-profit organizations and interest groups compete and interact to influence policymakers to deed in a item style.^[31]

The large ready of actors in the public policy process, such as politicians, civil servants, lobbyists, domain experts, and manufacture or sector representatives, use a diversity of tactics and tools to advance their aims, including advocating their positions publicly, attempting to educate supporters and opponents, and mobilizing allies on a particular issue.^[19]

Many actors tin can be important in the public policy process, but government officials ultimately choose public policy in response to the public issue or problem at hand. In doing so, government officials are expected to meet public sector ethics and take the needs of all project stakeholders into business relationship.^[30]

It is however worth noting that what public policy is put frontwards can be influenced past the political stance of the party in power. Following the 2008/2009 financial crunch, David Cameron's Conservative political party looked to implement a policy of austerity in 2010 after winning the full general election that yr, to shore up the economy and diminish the Great britain's national debt.^[32] Whilst the Conservatives saw reducing the national debt as an absolute priority, the Labour Political party, since the furnishings of Bourgeois austerity became apparent, have slated the policy for its 'needless' pressure on the working classes and those reliant on welfare, their 2019 ballot manifesto stating "Tory cuts [take] pushed our public services to breaking point" and that "the Conservatives have starved our education organization of funding".^[33] This is a skillful example of how varying political beliefs tin impact what is perceived as paramount for the electorate.

Since societies have changed in the past decades, the public policy making system changed also. In the 2010s, public policy making is increasingly goal-oriented, aiming for measurable results and goals, and decision-centric, focusing on decisions that must be taken immediately.^[30]

Furthermore, mass communications and technological changes such every bit the widespread availability of the Net have caused the public policy organisation to become more complex and interconnected.^[34] The changes pose new challenges to the current public policy systems and pressures leaders to evolve to remain effective and efficient.^[30]

Public policies come from all governmental entities and at all levels: legislatures, courts, bureaucratic agencies, and executive offices at national, local and country levels. On the federal level, public policies are laws enacted by Congress, executive orders issued past the president, decisions handed down past the U.s. Supreme Court, and regulations issued past bureaucratic agencies.^[35]

On the local, public policies include urban center ordinances, burn down codes, and traffic regulations. They too take the class of written rules and regulations of metropolis governmental departments: the police, fire departments, street repair, or building inspection. On the state level, public policies involve laws enacted by the land legislatures, decisions made past land courts, rules developed by state bureaucratic agencies, and decisions made by governors.^[35]

Policy design [edit]

Policy design entails conscious and deliberate effort to define policy aims and map them instrumentally.^[36] Policy design proposes critical analysis of policy instruments and their implementation. Uncertainties policy designers confront include (in brief):

Technical difficulties: mechanism, design, constituency, environment of public policies
Cost problems: resources, materials, products, etc.
Political problems: selection procedure of solutions and decision making. Policies require tedious and rigorous research on advise for its feasibility, legitimacy and pick.
Compliance: Agreement the target marketplace and discovering information for those dependent, disadvantaged or deviant on policy change.
Effectiveness: At that place is a possibility of spillovers, complementariness and inconsistencies.

All the same, policy blueprint is elemental for the succession of public policy, with information technology comes intricate and multi-level approaches only it is necessary for adept, careful policy blueprint to be considered earlier implementing the policy.^[36]

Information-driven policy [edit]

Data-driven policy is a policy designed past a government based on existing data, evidence, rational analysis and use of it to crystallize problems and highlight effective solutions.^[37] Data-driven policy making aims to brand utilize of data and collaborate with citizens to co-create policy.^[38] Policy makers can at present make utilize of new information sources and technological developments similar Artificial Intelligence to proceeds new insights and brand policy decisions which contribute to societal development.

User-centered policy design [edit]

User-centered policies are policies that are designed and implemented with the end-users, or those who are impacted by the policy, as co-designers.^[39] ^[40] Policymakers using this pattern process utilize users' knowledge of their lived experiences.^[39] This tin can allow for policymakers focus on including both comprehensiveness and comprehension inside policies to aid in clarity for end-users, such every bit workers or organizations.^[39]

Small-scale System dynamics model [edit]

The Small System dynamics model is a method of condensing and simplifying the understanding of complex bug related to overall productivity.^[41]

Evidence-based policy [edit]

Prove-based policy is associated with Adrian Smith because in his 1996 presidential address to the Royal Statistical Society, Smith questioned the electric current procedure of policy making and urged for a more "prove-based arroyo" commenting that it has "valuable lessons to offer".^[42]

Some policy scholars now avoid using the term evidence-based policy, using others such equally evidence informed. This language shift allows continued thinking about the underlying desire to ameliorate evidence employ in terms of its rigor or quality, while avoiding some of the key limitations or reductionist ideas at times seen with the evidence-based linguistic communication. Still, the language of evidence-based policy is widely used and, as such, can be interpreted to reflect a desire for evidence to be used well or appropriately in one way or some other – such equally by ensuring systematic consideration of rigorous and high quality policy relevant evidence, or by fugitive biased and erroneous applications of evidence for political ends.^[43]

In the U.Due south. [edit]

Different the U.k., the U.South. has a largely devolved government, with ability at local, state and federal level. Due to these diverse levels of governance, information technology can oftentimes exist difficult to coordinate passing bills and legislation, and at that place is ofttimes disagreement. Despite this, the system allows citizens to be relatively involved in inputting legislation. Furthermore, each level of government is ready in a similar way with similar rules, and all pump money into creating what is hoped to be effective legislation. Policy cosmos in America is often seen every bit unique to other countries.^[44]

Academic discipline [edit]

Every bit an academic subject field, public policy brings in elements of many social science fields and concepts, including economic science, sociology, political economy, social policy, program evaluation, policy analysis, and public management, all equally applied to problems of governmental administration, direction, and operations.^[45] At the same time, the written report of public policy is distinct from political science or economics, in its focus on the awarding of theory to practice. While the bulk of public policy degrees are chief's and doctoral degrees, there are several universities that offering undergraduate education in public policy. Notable institutions include:

Balsillie School of International Affairs
Blavatnik School of Government
Leiden University
Hertie School, Berlin
Graduate Institute of International and Evolution Studies, Geneva
John F. Kennedy Schoolhouse of Government, Harvard
London Schoolhouse of Economics
Sciences Po, Paris
National Defense Academy, Pakistan

Traditionally, the bookish field of public policy focused on domestic policy. However, the wave of economic globalization that occurred in the late 20th and early 21st centuries created a need for a subset of public policy that focused on global governance, especially as information technology relates to issues that transcend national borders such equally climate change, terrorism, nuclear proliferation, and economic development.^[46] Consequently, many traditional public policy schools had to conform their curricula to ameliorate suit this new policy landscape, also as develop entirely new curricula altogether.^[47]

Controversy surrounding public policy [edit]

The Austrian and Chicago school of economic science criticise public policymakers for non "agreement basic economics". In particular, a member of the Chicago school of economics, Thomas Sowell writes "Under popularly elected government, the political incentives are to practise what is popular, even if the consequences are worse than the consequences of doing nil, or doing something that is less popular".^[48] Therefore, since "Economics studies the consequences of decisions that are fabricated about the utilize of land, labour, capital and other resources that go into producing the volume of output which determines a country's standard of living";^[49] this means that artificially tampering with the allocation of deficient resources such as implementing sure public policies such as price controls will cause inefficiency in the economic system and decline in the standard of living within order.^[50] ^[51] ^[52] ^[53]

Ane of the biggest controversies of public policy is that policy making is oftentimes influenced past lobbyists such every bit big corporations in order to sway policies in their favour. In the United States for instance, the National Rifle Association (NRA) is a lobbyist organisation that lobbies lawmakers that oppose stricter gun laws.^[54]

See likewise [edit]

Advocacy
Advocacy evaluation
Eightfold path (policy analysis)
Harold Lasswell
Listing of public policy topics by land
List of public administration schools
Mandate (politics)
Overton window
Policy
Public comment
Public policy school
Public criminology

References [edit]

^ ^a ^b ^c Lassance, Antonio (2020-11-10). "What Is a Policy and What Is a Authorities Program? A Unproblematic Question With No Clear Respond, Until Now". Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3727996. S2CID 234600314. SSRN 3727996.
^ Rinfret, Sara; Scheberie, Denise; Pautz, Michelle (2018). "Chapter two: The Policy Process and Policy Theories". Public Policy: A Concise Introduction. SAGE Publications. pp. nineteen–44. ISBN978-1-5063-2971-0.
^ Nawarat, Nongyao; Medley, Michael (2018). "The Public Regime for Migrant Child Education in Thailand: Alternative Depictions of Policy". Asian Politics and Policy. x (3): 412–415. doi:x.1111/aspp.12408. S2CID 158615070.
^ Easton, David (1953). The political arrangement: An enquiry into the state of political science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. p. 130.
^ Cairney, Paul (2012). Agreement public policy: Theories and problems. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 5.
^ Titmuss, Richard (1974). Social Policy. London: George Allen & Unwin. p. 23. ISBN0-394-49447-4.
^ Weiss, Carol H. (1972). Evaluation. London: Pearson. pp. 46–seventy. ISBN978-0-13-292193-0.
^ Kathryn E. Newcomer; Harry P. Hatry; Joseph S. Wholey (2015). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. pp. 62–88. ISBN978-i-118-89360-ix.
^ Dye, Thomas R. (1972). Understanding Public Policy. Upper Saddle, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. p. 2. ISBN978-0-205-71685-2.
^ Dye, Thomas R. (1972). Understanding Public Policy. Upper Saddle, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. p. xiii. ISBN978-0-13-613147-ii.
^ "Characteristics of Successful Public Policy". Norwich University Public Administration. Norwich University Public Administration. Retrieved 24 November 2014.
^ Peters, B. G. (2015). Advanced Introduction to Public Policy. Edward Elgar. p. three. ISBN978-1-78195-576-five.
^ Dente, Bruno (2013-12-05), "Understanding Policy Decisions", SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–27, doi:x.1007/978-3-319-02520-9_1, ISBN978-3-319-02519-three
^ "Definitions of Public Policy and the Police force". mainweb-v.musc.edu.
^ Schuster, W. Michael (31 December 2008). "For the Greater Good: The Use of Public Policy Considerations in Confirming Affiliate 11 Plans of Reorganization". SSRN 1368469.
^ Pellissery, Sony (2019). Transformative Constabulary and Public Policy. New Delhi: Routledge. ISBN9780367348298.
^ ^a ^b John, Peter (1998). Analyzing Public Policy. London: Continuum. p. 10. ISBN978-0-203-13621-8.
^ John, Peter (1998). Analysing Public Policy. Continuum.
^ ^a ^b Sharkansky, Ira; R. Hofferbert. "Dimensions of Country Politics, Economics, and Public Policy". The American Political Science Review.
^ Dusza, Karl (1989). "Max Weber's conception of the country". International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society. 3: 71–105. doi:10.1007/BF01430691. S2CID 145585927.
^ Cairney, Paul (2012), "Introduction: Theories and Problems", Understanding Public Policy, London: Macmillan Education United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland, pp. i–21, doi:10.1007/978-0-230-35699-3_1, ISBN978-0-230-22971-6 , retrieved 2021-01-x
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Dorey, Peter (2005). Policy Making in Britain: An Introduction. London. doi:10.4135/9781446279410. ISBN978-0-7619-4904-6.
^ Wilson, William (1993), "Can Sociology Play a Greater Role in Shaping the National Agenda?", Sociology and the Public Calendar, 2455 Teller Route, Thousand Oaks California 91320 Us: SAGE Publications, Inc., pp. iii–22, doi:ten.4135/9781483325484.n1, ISBN978-0-8039-5083-two , retrieved 2021-01-22 {{commendation}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
^ Béland, Daniel; Howlett, Michael (2016-05-26). "The Role and Bear upon of the Multiple-Streams Approach in Comparative Policy Analysis". Journal of Comparative Policy Assay: Research and Practise. 18 (iii): 221–227. doi:ten.1080/13876988.2016.1174410. ISSN 1387-6988. S2CID 156139395.
^ Gupta, Kuhika; Jenkins-Smith, Hank (2016-07-07). Lodge, Martin; Folio, Edward C; Balla, Steven J (eds.). "Anthony Downs, 'Up and Downwards with Ecology: The "Issue-Attention" Cycle'". Oxford Handbooks Online. doi:x.1093/oxfordhb/9780199646135.013.34.
^ Howlett Michael, Giest Sarah (2013). "Affiliate 2: The policy-making process". Routledge Handbook of public policy. London; New York: Routledge.
^ "Top-downwards and Bottom-upward Approaches within Implementation". Political Pipeline. 21 February 2013.
^ "StackPath" (PDF). Institute for Authorities. Retrieved 2021-01-22 .
^ "Understanding policy cycles". EgyptToday. 2018-08-02. Retrieved 2021-01-22 .
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Thei, Geurts (2010). "Public Policy Making: The 21st Century Perspective".
^ Kilpatrick
^ Stanley, Liam (2016-03-07). "Legitimacy gaps, taxpayer conflict, and the politics of thrift in the Uk" (PDF). The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. eighteen (two): 389–406. doi:10.1177/1369148115615031. ISSN 1369-1481. S2CID 156681378.
^ "Rebuild our Public Services". The Labour Party . Retrieved 2019-12-31 .
^ Schramm, Wilbur (165). The Process and Effects of mass communication . Urbana, University of Illinois Press. ISBN978-0-252-00197-0.
^ ^a ^b Wilson, Carter (2006). Public Policy: Continuity and Alter. Illinois: Waveland Press. p. eighteen. ISBN1-4786-3671-eight.
^ ^a ^b Howlett, Michael (2010-12-17). Designing Public Policies. doi:ten.4324/9780203838631. ISBN978-0-203-83863-1.
^ Esty, Daniel; Rushing, Reece (Summer 2007). "The Promise of Data-Driven Policymaking". Issues in Science and Engineering. 23 (4). Retrieved 2020-01-08 .
^ van Veenstra, Anne Fleur; Kotterink, Bas (2017). "Information-Driven Policy Making: The Policy Lab Approach" (PDF). Electronic Participation. Lecture Notes in Information science. Springer International Publishing. 10429: 100–111. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64322-9_9. ISBN978-3-319-64321-2.
^ ^a ^b ^c Ranney, Frances (11 March 2009). "Beyond Foucault: Toward a user‐centered approach to sexual harassment policy". Technical Advice Quarterly. ix (1): 9–28. doi:10.1080/10572250009364683. S2CID 143856976.
^ Moilanen, Stephen (May 15, 2019). "When to Utilise User-Centered Pattern for Public Policy". Stanford Social Innovation Review . Retrieved 2020-11-06 .
^ Ghaffarzadegan, Navid; Lyneis, John; Richardson, George P. (2011). "How pocket-size system dynamics models can assistance the public policy procedure". System Dynamics Review. 27 (1): 22–44. CiteSeerXx.1.1.407.8702. doi:10.1002/sdr.442. ISSN 1099-1727.
^ Boaz, Ashby, Immature (2002). "Systematic Reviews: What take they got to offer evidence based policy and practise?" ESRC U.k. Centre for Prove Based Policy and Practice. Retrieved vii May 2016
^ Parkhurst, Justin (2017). The Politics of Evidence: from Evidence Based Policy to the Good Governance of Evidence (PDF). London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315675008. ISBN978-1-138-93940-0. ^{[ page needed ]}
^ Peters, B. Guy (30 September 2015). American public policy : promise and performance (Tenth ed.). Los Angeles. ISBN978-1-4833-9150-2. OCLC 908375236.
^ Pellissery, Sony (2015). "Public Policy". The SAGE Encyclopedia of World Poverty. Sage.
^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-04-26. Retrieved 2011-11-29 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
^ Stone, Diane. "Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks". Policy Studies Journal 36, no. 1 (2008): xix–38
^ Sowell, Thomas (2014). Bones Economics. Bones Books. p. 416.
^ Sowell, Thomas (2014). Bones Economics. Basic Books. p. 4.
^ Hazlitt, Henry (1988). Economics in 1 lesson.
^ Rothbard, Murray (1963). America's Nifty Depression.
^ Mises, Ludwig Von (1936). Socialism. pp. 99–113.
^ Mises, Ludwig Von (1949). Human being Action.
^ "How the NRA, a powerful influence on American politics, constitute itself under attack". CBC (Canadian Dissemination Corporation). 2020-09-03. Retrieved 2022-01-xviii .